JobSheet vs Workiz | UK Field Service Software Comparison
JobSheet vs Workiz (UK Comparison 2026)
Independent comparison for UK trade businesses. Workiz pricing and features change. Confirm details on workiz.com/pricing-plans and with their sales team.
JobSheet and Workiz both help home and field service businesses book jobs, manage customers, and run teams from the office and the van. Workiz is often positioned as a Jobber or Housecall Pro alternative with stronger sales and communication tools. JobSheet stays focused on simple UK job management with published GBP pricing and no heavy CRM layer.
Workiz emphasises built-in call tracking, lead management, and automation for growing US home-service companies. JobSheet emphasises job sheets, scheduling, and UK trade workflows with Companies House import where you need it.
Quick verdict
| Best for | Winner |
|---|---|
| UK trade simplicity | JobSheet |
| Call tracking and lead pipeline | Workiz |
| Lowest predictable cost (published GBP) | JobSheet |
| Transparent pricing without a demo quote | JobSheet |
| Sales and communication automation | Workiz |
| Locksmiths, cleaning, pest control growth focus | Workiz |
| Fast setup | JobSheet |
| Demo-led quote for core plans | Workiz |
| Commercial / project-style job depth | JobSheet (lighter than Workiz for complex FM; neither is simPRO-class) |
Pricing comparison
JobSheet pricing matches our live catalog. Workiz plan structure from workiz.com/pricing-plans (May 2026). Core subscription prices are Request pricing; only extra user rates are shown in USD on the page. UK businesses should confirm GBP billing, VAT, and support before buying.
| Platform | Pricing structure |
|---|---|
| JobSheet | £15/month + £5 per additional user (GBP, published) |
| Workiz | Request pricing on Kickstart, Standard, and Pro; Ultimate via Contact us; optional phone plan sold separately |
Why you cannot see a monthly price on the website
Workiz’s pricing page lists four paid tiers plus a Lite row in the feature matrix, but the headline cards for Kickstart, Standard, and Pro all say Request pricing. Ultimate says Contact us. The page markets “fairly priced” software, yet the base subscription dollar amounts are not published on the public page.
What is published: included user bundles, plan features, automation limits, and per-seat add-on rates for two tiers (below).
Workiz plans (what they show publicly)
| Plan | Users included (stated) | Public base price | Highlights |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lite | (entry tier in feature table) | Not shown on cards | Caps such as 20 jobs / 20 invoices / 20 estimates in the comparison matrix |
| Kickstart | First 3 users (monthly billing stated) | Request pricing | Scheduling, 2 automations, invoices/jobs/estimates, online payments, reports, local number, client management |
| Standard | First 5 users | Request pricing | Kickstart plus QuickBooks Online, 5 automations, custom fields, location tracking, service areas, subcontractors, leads tracking |
| Pro | First 5 users | Request pricing (marked Most popular) | Standard plus performance pay, 10 automations, Genius leads, Genius scheduling, custom reports |
| Ultimate | Growing / enterprise teams | Contact us | Pro plus 30 automations, service plans, sales proposals, inventory, flat rate, multi-day jobs, equipment tracking, purchase orders, Zapier |
All paid tiers include (per their page): scheduling, automations, invoices and estimates, online payments, a local number, and client management.
Trial: 7 days free, no credit card (per their FAQ).
Annual billing: discounted vs monthly; FAQ mentions saving $400+ on annual plans (details behind the quote flow).
The only published USD seat prices (extra users)
At the bottom of the pricing page, Workiz lists add-on member pricing for Standard and Pro only:
| Plan | Extra user (annual billing) | Extra user (monthly billing) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | $46/month each | $55/month each |
| Pro | $54/month each | $65/month each |
There is no published add-on rate for Kickstart on that footnote. Base Kickstart/Standard/Pro/Ultimate package prices still require Request pricing.
Important add-on: Workiz Communication (integrated phone, AI answering, call insights, 2-way texting, ad tracking, etc.) is sold separately from the core plans. Budget for the phone product if that is why you are comparing Workiz to Jobber or Housecall Pro.
JobSheet pricing example
| Team size | Monthly cost (GBP) |
|---|---|
| 1 user | £15 |
| 2 users | £20 |
| 5 users | £35 |
| 10 users | £60 |
Illustrative cost thinking (not a Workiz quote)
If sales quotes you on Standard with 5 users included and you need 10 people total, the public page implies 5 extra seats at $46 to $55 each per month (USD), plus the unknown base package fee, plus phone if required.
| Scenario | JobSheet | Workiz (public info only) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 people | £35/month GBP | Base fee unknown (Request pricing); up to 5 may be included on Standard/Pro |
| 10 people on Standard | £60/month GBP | Base fee unknown + roughly 5 × $46–55/month extra users (USD) + optional phone plan |
Pricing takeaway: Workiz is not transparent like Tradify’s £34/user table or JobSheet’s £15 + £5 model. You need a demo quote for the subscription, then add per-user overages and phone if you want their core differentiator. Confirm currency and UK tax treatment before comparing to GBP tools.
Practical takeaway for UK owners
- JobSheet: know your bill on the website; no US sales-tax framing.
- Workiz: treat the pricing page as a feature picker; get a written quote for Kickstart vs Standard vs Pro, extra users beyond the bundle, Ultimate if you are larger, and the integrated phone product.
- UK fit: Workiz is US-headquartered (San Diego / Austin). Confirm UK operations, QuickBooks vs Xero, and whether phone/SMS products work for your numbers.
Feature comparison
| Feature | JobSheet | Workiz |
|---|---|---|
| Job scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile job sheets | Yes | Yes |
| Quotes and invoicing | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in call tracking | No | Yes (phone plan, sold separately) |
| Lead management / sales pipeline | Basic | Strong (Standard+) |
| Customer messaging automation | Basic | Strong |
| UK Companies House import | Yes | No |
| Published core plan prices | Yes (GBP) | No (request pricing) |
| Free trial | Yes | 7 days, no card |
| Commercial project depth | Moderate | Moderate (Ultimate adds inventory, multi-day jobs) |
| Setup speed | Very fast | Moderate |
Growth tools vs job execution
Workiz fits businesses that treat the phone and leads as the centre of the operation: tracking inbound calls, following up estimates, and automating customer communication. Common in locksmiths, cleaning, pest control, and other home services that invest in inside sales.
JobSheet fits teams that already know how they win work and mainly need reliable job records, schedules, and engineer updates. Less software around the phone system; more clarity on what is booked, who is assigned, and what happened on site.
Who should use JobSheet
JobSheet is ideal for:
- UK electricians, plumbers, and multi-trade teams
- businesses replacing paper or spreadsheets
- owners who want engineers and office on one job record
- teams that do not need a bundled call-tracking product
Who should use Workiz
Workiz may be a better fit for:
- home service businesses scaling marketing and inbound leads
- companies comparing Jobber or Housecall Pro and wanting more sales tooling
- operations where call tracking and lead automation are daily requirements
- US-oriented teams comfortable with Workiz’s market focus (confirm UK support and billing)
Final verdict
Workiz is often the “Jobber alternative with more sales tools.” JobSheet is the alternative when you want less CRM noise and more straightforward job management.
Choose JobSheet if:
- you want mobile-first job sheets and UK customer setup
- your bottleneck is job visibility, not lead pipeline software
- you prefer simple pricing and quick onboarding
Choose Workiz if:
- call tracking and lead management are core to how you grow revenue
- you want stronger automation around customer communication
- you are comparing growth-focused US home-service platforms, not enterprise FM systems